<?xml version="1.0"?>
<document url="./proposal-workflow.xml">

  <properties>
    <author>Craig R. McClanahan</author>
    <title>Proposal - Workflow Management System</title>
  </properties>

  <body>

    <section name="Recent Developments">

        <p>
            Work on this initiative has stalled.
            It is recommended that interested parties look to the
            <a href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/index.html">Commons Jelly</a> product.
            A way to persist the workflow state between sessions is needed, but Jelly otherwise fills the needs
            identified by this proosal.
        </p>

    </section>

  <section name="Background and Goals">

  <p>Struts 1.0 has become an increasingly popular platform for constructing
  web applications based on a Model-View-Controller type design pattern (also
  known as the <em>Front Controller</em> pattern.  It has achieved this
  popularity for many reasons, but key among them have been:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>The simplicity of the basic organizational principles (once you
      understand them)</li>
  <li>The principle of <em>logical naming</em> to assist in isolating
      the view layer and the model layer, so that changes in one do not
      have to impact the other</li>
  <li>A rich set of tools to assist in creating pages with dynamic content
      exposed by the model layer through JavaBeans</li>
  </ul>

  <p>One consequence of the original Struts design, however, is that the
  framework does not provide much assistance in organizing business
  transactions that require more than one interaction with the user (i.e.
  they span more than one JSP page and/or Action).  Applications are left
  to manage navigation issues, as well as deal with ActionForms whose
  logical contents crosses page boundaries.</p>

  <p>The original Struts design materially assists page designers in creating
  dynamic pages, while protecting them from having to be very concerned with
  the business logic -- other than the names of the JavaBeans used to
  communicate model layer data to the presentation layer.  However, Struts 1.0
  still requires a Java developer to be involved on the business logic side
  (even if all of the functional logic is already available in Java classes)
  in order to create the Action classes.</p>

  <p>The purpose of this <em>Workflow Management System</em> proposal is to
     address some of these consequences.  In particular, it intends to address
     the following set of goals:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>Create a means where multiple-user-interaction business processes can be
      configured (scripted), including support for conditional processing
      and branching.</li>
  <li>Support scripting elements that lets business application experts,
      who are not necessarily Java developers, can integrate pre-existing
      business functionality that is available as public methods on
      arbitrary Java classes.</li>
  <li>Assist page designers in creating the user interface elements that
      correspond to navigation links within, or between, work flows.</li>
  </ul>

  </section>


  <section name="Use Cases and Examples">

    <p>To give a flavor of what scripted workflow activities might look like,
    it is useful to consider some possible use case scenarios.  The
    syntax that is shown for the examples should be considered as
    illustrative of what should be possible, rather than normative.
    No rigorous attempt has been made to guarantee consistency
    between (or even within) these examples.</p>

    <subsection name="Application Logon">

      <p>The example application included with Struts (like many other
      web applications) uses application-managed security, including
      a logon form.  Consider that a business logic bean might be available
      (in some scope under key <code>authenticator</code>)
      that knows how to authenticate users given a username and password.
      It could be utilized to script application logon like this:</p>

<pre>
&lt;activity id="Application Logon"&gt;

  &lt;-- Display the logon form (web framework independent) --&gt;
  &lt;web:forward id="display" page="/logon.jsp"/&gt;

  &lt;-- Authenticate the username and password, returning a Principal
      if accepted, or null if not --&gt;
  &lt;web:set  name="username" value="$parameter:username"/&gt;
  &lt;web:set  name="password" value="$parameter:password"/&gt;
  &lt;core:invoke bean="authenticator" method="authenticate"&gt;
    &lt;core:param type="java.lang.String" value="$username"/&gt;
    &lt;core:param type="java.lang.String" value="$password"/&gt;
    &lt;core:return name="principal"/&gt;
  &lt;/core:invoke&gt;

  &lt;-- If no Principal was returned, branch back to the logon form --&gt;
  &lt;core:if expr="$principal == null"&gt;
    &lt;web:set name="error" value="$messages.lookup('invalid.logon')"/&gt;
    &lt;core:branch idref="display"/&gt;
  &lt;/core:if&gt;

  &lt;-- Exit to the "Main Menu" workflow --&gt;
  &lt;core:goto name="Main Menu"/&gt;

&lt;/activity&gt;
</pre>

    </subsection>


    <subsection name="Simple Multi-Page Wizard">

      <p>Many complex data entry operations can be simplified (from the
      user's point of view) by dividing them up into a series of simple
      dialog pages that ask a few (often one) question that leads ultimately
      to a completed set of information required to process a request.
      In many cases, each page of the interaction will have navigation
      controls so that the user can short cut to immediate execution,
      or cancel the entire interaction.  Such an interaction might be
      modelled like this:</p>

<pre>
&lt;activity id="Simple Wizard Application"&gt;

  &lt;!-- Display the first page of the iteration --&gt;
  &lt;!-- (Using Struts-specific logical-to-physical mapping) --&gt;
  &lt;struts:forward id="page1" name="Simple Wizard Page 1"&gt;

  &lt;!-- Process navigation input from the first page --&gt;
  &lt;!-- (Can do something much like this framework-independently too) --&gt;
  &lt;struts:navigate&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="CANCEL" idref="cancel"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="FINISH" idref="finish"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="NEXT"   idref="page2"/&gt;
  &lt;/struts:navigate&gt;

  &lt;!-- Display the second page of the iteration --&gt;
  &lt;struts:forward id="page2" name="Simple Wizard Page 2"&gt;

  &lt;!-- Process navigation input from the second page --&gt;
  &lt;struts:navigate&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="CANCEL" idref="cancel"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="FINISH" idref="finish"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="NEXT"   idref="page3"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="PREV"   idref="page1"/&gt;
  &lt;/struts:navigate&gt;

  &lt;!-- Display the third page of the iteration --&gt;
  &lt;struts:forward id="page3" name="Simple Wizard Page 3"&gt;

  &lt;!-- Process navigation input from the third page --&gt;
  &lt;struts:navigate&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="CANCEL" idref="cancel"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="FINISH" idref="finish"/&gt;
    &lt;struts:branch control="PREV"   idref="page2"/&gt;
  &lt;/struts:navigate&gt;

  &lt;!-- Process the FINISH navigation control as appropriate --&gt;
  &lt;xxx:yyy id="finish" .../&gt;
  &lt;core:goto name="Main Menu"/&gt;

  &lt;!-- Process the CANCEL navigation control as appropriate --&gt;
  &lt;xxx:yyy id="cancel" .../&gt;
  &lt;core:goto name="Main Menu"/&gt;

&lt;/activity&gt;
</pre>


      <p>Not illustrated above, but also interesting to explore, would be
      the situation where choices on one page affect whether some pages
      in the overall flow might be skipped.</p>

    </subsection>


  </section>


  <section name="User Visible Features">


    <p>Workflow system capabilities will be exposed to applications through
    Java APIs that represent both the static description of particular
    activities and the dynamic current state of a computation.  Object
    factory and pluggable implementation patterns shall be used where
    appropriate to maximize the generality and flexibility of the system.</p>


    <subsection name="Workflow Management System Implementation Objects">

      <p>The following classes represent the primary components of the
      workflow management system:</p>

      <p><strong>Registry</strong> - Collection into which multiple
      <em>Process</em> and <em>Activity</em> static descriptions can be
      stored and retrieved by String-valued keys.</p>

      <p><strong>Process</strong> - The static description of a tree of
      business activities that are executed in a nested fashion, often by
      separate individuals (or application systems).</p>

      <p><strong>Activity</strong> - The static description of a sequence
      of Steps that are generally executed by a single individual (or
      application system), within a reasonably short period of time.</p>

      <p><strong>Step</strong> - The static description of an individual
      task to be performed as a discrete, indivisible, unit.  Steps can
      also be nested inside other steps, to provide for looping and
      conditional processing.  A rich set of built-in Step implementations
      shall be provided (including powerful capabilities such as the
      execution of an arbitrary method on an arbitrary Java object), and
      mechanisms to extend the set of supported Step implementations
      allows arbitrary extensibility.</p>

      <p><strong>Context</strong> - The dynamic state of a computation
      through an <em>Activity</em> (or a set of nested <em>Activities</em>),
      including provision of storage space for JavaBeans produced and
      consumed by other Steps.  Contexts keep track of the current Step
      being executed, so that activity processing can be suspended and
      resumed later.</p>

      <p><strong>Scope</strong> - A <code>Map</code> into which
      arbitrary Java objects can stored and retrieved by String-valued keys.
      Context support a number of individual Scopes, each of which can be
      plugged in from application logic, to provide integration into
      existing application functionality.  For example, in a web application
      implementation, Scopes will generally be mapped directly to request
      attributes, session attributes, and servlet context attributes as
      provided by the Servlet API.</p>

    </subsection>


    <subsection name="Built-In Steps">

      <p>A rich variety of built-in <em>Step</em> implementations (and
      corresponding XML elements in specified namespaces) will be provided
      as part of the basic workflow engine, and as part of the associated
      Struts integration of this engine.</p>

      <p><strong>Bean Interaction</strong> - The ability to get and set
      JavaBeans in arbitrary Scopes (mapped via the Context to real collections
      of objects).</p>

      <p><strong>Control Flow</strong> - Conditionals and looping, where
      control flow Steps can contain nested sets of Steps to an arbitrary
      degree.</p>

      <p><strong>Method Execution</strong> - Execute arbitrary public methods
      of beans stored in some Scope, passing specified arguments (expressions
      or bean references) and returning the method's result (if any) to a
      named bean in some Scope.  To maximize usefulness of the workflow
      system in composing applications, <strong>no</strong> restrictions
      should be placed on the object types these Steps can interact with.</p>

      <p><strong>Activity Management</strong> - GOTO a named Activity
      (exiting the current one), CALL a named Activity (resuming the current
      one when the called Activity returns, RETURN from a called Activity,
      EXIT the Activity system.</p>

      <p><strong>User Interaction</strong> - Suspend workflow execution to
      interact with the user in some application specific way.  For example,
      a web application would display a page and wait for input to be
      submitted before resuming the workflow.</p>

      <p><strong>Specialized Processing</strong> - Prebuilt Steps for common
      processing functions such as XSLT transformations, performing
      arbitrary SQL queries, sending mail, and so on.</p>

    </subsection>


  </section>


  <section name="Implementation Notes">

  <p>The implementation of this proposal will be divided into three major
  development layers:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>Core workflow management system capabilities and built in Step
      implementations that are independent of application environment.
      [Code in jakarta-commons]</li>
  <li>Specialized implementation of workflow management system components
      that integrate with the Servlet API in a manner that is independent
      of any specific application framework.  [Code in jakarta-commons]</li>
  <li>Specialized implementation of workflow management system components
      that is tightly integrated with Struts's internal architecture and
      custom tag libraries.  [Code in jakarta-struts]</li>
  </ul>

  <p>The workflow management system will support the general concept of
  <em>Scopes</em> in which beans can be stashed, with pluggable
  implementations for integration into different working environments.
  None of the APIs in the workflow engine itself will have any reference
  to the web layer (i.e. no imports of <code>javax.servlet.*</code>).</p>

  <p>Suitable object factory and pluggability APIs will be included
  to guarantee extensibility of the basic framework.
  </p>

  <p>Scripting of business transactions will be codified in XML documents
  that conform to an appropriate DTD and/or schema.  The XML technology
  that is used will facilitate extensible definitions of <em>Steps</em>
  and other components, in both the XML description of these components and
  in the set of Java objects that implements them.
  </p>

    
  <p>When designing the detailed syntax of the XML representation
  of Steps, consider whether it is feasible for advanced development
  tools to "compile" activities into individual classes to optimize
  overall performance.
  </p>
  
  <p>When designing the detailed syntax of the XML representation
  of Steps, consideration should be given to emulating the syntax
  of other XML applications that are similar in spirit or detail
  to the concepts of scripting a business transaction.  Useful
  models to consider include:
  </p>
    <ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt">XSL Transformations (XSLT)</a>
        - Includes control flow mechanisms that are becoming widely
        known and understood, which could be mimicked.</li>
    <li><a href="http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/jsptl-doc/intro.html">
        JSP Standard Tag Library (Early Access)</a> - The design goals for
        many of the JSP custom tags in this library (produced by the
        JSR-052 expert group under the Java Community Process) are similar
        enough to provide a useful model for conditionals, looping, and
        interaction with objects in arbitrary scopes.</li>
    </ul>

    <p>To maximize the usefulness of built-in actions, an expression
    language that knows how to manipulate objects in the Scopes associated
    with the current Context will need to be supported.  Useful models to
    consider include:</p>
    <ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath">XML Path Language (XPath)</a>
        - Will be familiar to XML-oriented application developers because
        it is used throughout the suite of XML specifications.</li>
    <li>JavaScript like expression languages - Will be familiar to page
        developers (as well as Struts developers familiar with the
        nested and indexed property accessor syntax of many Struts tags).</li>
    </ul>

    <p>From the workflow script developer's point of view, XML namespaces
    will be used to introduce extended sets of Step implementations.  There
    will need to be mechanisms to map a particular namespace to a set of
    legal XML elements (within that namespace) and corresponding Java
    classes that provide the functionality for those Steps.</p>

  <p>The web layer integration will include a mechanism to map scopes (from
  the workflow perspective) into the standard <em>request</em>,
  <em>session</em>, and <em>application</em> scopes of the web layer.
  Thus, workflow scripts will be able to place beans in appropriate
  scopes such that JSP pages can directly pull that data into the presentation,
  much as Struts Actions (and the business logic classes that are called by
  those Actions) can place beans there in a Struts 1.0 based application.
  Utilizing these capabilities, application developers will be able to
  "script" the business logic requirements of many applications, by
  combining functional logic already available as methods on business
  logic beans, without having to involve Java programmers to create new
  Actions (or otherwise synthesize business logic out of the constituent
  pieces).</p>

  <p>Components in the web layer integration may import APIs from the
  Servlet and JSP specifications, but not from any application specific
  framework.  Framework-specific integration will occur on top of the
  generic web layer integration.</p>

  <p>In addition, the Struts integration will include a small custom tag
  library will be included, so that page
  developers can easily create navigational links and controls.  Examples
  of such controls include links to the "next", "previous", and "finish"
  pages of a wizard dialog, a "cancel" button to exit a workflow early, or
  an "invoke" button to invoke a new workflow as a subroutine, and then
  return to the current step of the original workflow.  Utilizing these
  capabilities, page developers can create the individual visible pieces
  of a work flow dialog, without having to be involved in navigational
  complexities.</p>

  </section>


  </body>

</document>
